Amerykański spór o status prawny kryptowalut, czyli o tym, w jaki sposób SEC i CFTC rozumieją kryptowaluty
PDF

Słowa kluczowe

kryptowaluty
SEC
CFTC
dowód stawki
dowód pracy
papiery wartościowe
towary
umowy inwestycyjne
kryterium decentralizacji
test Howeya

Abstrakt

The American legal system is experiencing a competence dispute between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) whose essence boils down to the question of which agency is competent in the supervision of the cryptocurrency market. The dispute is positive, as both agencies recognize their jurisdiction over this market, but the sources and scope of jurisdiction are different. The SEC derives its authority by recognizing cryptocurrencies as securities under the Securities Act of 1933, while the CFTC treats them as commodities under the Commodity Exchange Act of 1934. The jurisdiction of both bodies is not based on the literal wording of the cited legislation. Rather, it results from a functional interpretation of the terms "security" and "commodity". The analysis of the acts of application of the law issued by the SEC shows that the adopted classification largely violates the postulate of legal certainty, introducing many ambiguities for market participants. The aim of this article is to present the essence of the competence dispute between both agencies and the scope of their supervisory powers, which seem to be expanding with each subsequent case examined by them.

PDF

Bibliografia

Angelo di M., Salzer G.: Tokens, Types, and Standards: Identification and Utilizationin Ethereum, "2020 IEEE International Conference on Decentralized Applications and Infrastructures (DAPPS)", Oxford 2020, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/docu-ment/9126009/citations#citations.

Awosika E.: Governance Is The Holy Grail For DAOs. Finding the right governance mechanism is critical to the long-term survival of any DAO, https://businesstech-guides.co/dao-voting-mechanisms.

BlockFi Agrees to Pay 100 Million in Penalties and Pursue Registration of its Crypto Lending Product, https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2022-26.

Bodó B., Brekke J.K., Hoepman J.H.: Decentralisation in the blockchain space, Internet Policy Review 2021, nr 10(2).

CFTC: A CFTC Primer in Virtual Currencies (Oct 17, 2017), https://www.cftc.gov/sites/default/files/idc/groups/public/documents/file/labcftc_primercurrencies100417.pdf.

CFTC: Final Interpretive Guidance: Retail Commodity Transactions Involving Certain Digital Assets, 85 FR 37734: 17 CFR Part 1, https://www.cftc.gov/sites/ default/files/2020/06/2020-11827a.pdf.

Cherry N.: CFTC v. My Big Coin Pay: The CFTCs Jurisdiction over Cryptocurrency, Review of Banking & Financial Law 2019, t. 38, s. 530-531.

Clayton J.: Chairmans Testimony on Virtual Currencies: The Roles of the SEC and CFT, https://www.sec.gov/news/testimony/testimony-virtual-currencies-over- sight-role-us-securities-and-exchange-commission.

Clemens R.: Built to Fail: The Inherent Fragility of Algorithmic Stablecoins, 11 Wake Forest Law Review, Online 131 (October 2021), https://ssrn.com/abstract=- 3952045 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3952045.

Connelly C.: SECs View That Crypto Tokens Are Securities Causes Legal Woes for Ripple, https://news.bloomberglaw.com/class-action/secs-view-that-crypto- tokens-are-securities-causes-legal-woes-for-ripple.

Craig T.: How Decentralized Is Solana?, https://cryptobriefing.com/how-decentra- lized-is-solana/.

Crocker L.J.: Investment Contracts under Federal and State Law, Case Western Reserve Law Review 1966, t. 17, nr 4, s. 1125.

Dąbrowska J.: Charakter prawny bitcoin, Człowiek w Cyberprzestrzeni 2017, nr 1, s. 59.

Deer M.: What is a crypto launchpad, and how does it work?, https://cointelegraph. com/news/what-is-a-crypto-launchpad-and-how-does-it-work.

Dhillon V. i in.: Zastosowania technologii blockchain, Warszawa 2018.

Gems, https://coinmarketcap.com/alexandria/glossary/gems.

Gensler G.: Remarks Before the Aspen Security Forum (Speech), https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/gensler-aspen-security-forum-2021-08-03.

George K.: BlockFi Heading For Bankruptcy As FTX Contagion Spreads, https://www.investopedia.com/blockfi-heading-for-bankruptcy-6829259.

Goforth C.R.: SEC v. Telegram: A Global Message, University of Memphis Law Review 2021, t. 52, s. 9, 26.

Hinman W.: Digital Asset Transactions: When Howey Met Gary (Plastic), https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/speech-hinman-061418.

Janicki T., Kociak-Janicka N.: Świadczenie usług w wirtualnym świecie, Prawo i Podatki 2021, nr 4, s. 7.

Kondova G., Barba R.: Governance of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations, Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing 2019, t. 15, nr 9, s. 407.

Kosior M.: Ripple chce wiedzieć, dlaczego Ether nie jest papierem wartościowym, https://bithub.pl/kryptowaluty/altcoin/ripple-chce-wiedziec-dlaczego-ether-nie- jest-papierem-wartosciowym/.

Kowalewski M.: Spór o właściwość a spór kompetencyjny w postępowaniu administracyjnym, Studia Administracyjne 2021, nr 2(14), s. 17.

Kwiatkowski W.: Stabilność i bezpieczeństwo systemu finansowego w USA w kilka lat po wejściu w życie ustawy Dodda-Franka, Zeszyty Prawnicze 2017, t. 17, nr 3, s. 117.

Ligon Ch.: SEC Chairman Gensler Suggests Again That Proof-of-Stake Tokens Are Securities: Report, https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2023/03/15/sec-chairman- gensler-suggests-again-that-proof-of-stake-tokens-are-securities-report/.

Lin Q., Li Ch., Zhao X., Chen X.: Measuring Decentralization in Bitcoin and Ethe- reum using Multiple Metrics and Granularities, https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.10699. Liu J., Makarov I., Schoar A.: Anatomy of a Run: The Terra Luna Crash, Working Paper 2023, nr 31160, s. 10, 12.

Lucking D., Aravind V.: Cryptocurrency as a Commodity: The CFTCs Regulatory Framework, s. 2, 4, https://www.allenovery.com/global/-/media/allenovery/2_documents/news_and_insights/publications/2020/08/global_legal_insights_guide_- _cryptocurrency_as_a_commodity_the_cftcs_regulatory_framework.pdf.

McAvoy D.L., Schmalfeld J.E.: SEC Hints at Path for Digital Assets to Morph Into Non-Securities, National Law Review 2022, t. 12, nr 230.

McCullough A. i in.: Despite BlockFis 100 Million Settlement with the SEC for Failing to Register as an Investment Company, BlockFi is Under Fire From Investors, https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/despite-blockfi-s-100-million- 2246263/.

Michna M.: Bitcoin jako przedmiot stosunków cywilnoprawnych, Warszawa 2018, s. 45.

Moszyński M., Stocka A.: Kryzys finansowy w Stanach Zjednoczonych a model nadzoru nad rynkiem finansowym, Acta Universitatis Nicolai Copernici. Ekono- mia 2008, t. 38.

Opitek P.: Przeciwdziałanie praniu pieniędzy z wykorzystaniem walut wirtualnych w świetle krajowych i międzynarodowych regulacji AML, Prokuratura i Prawo 2020, nr 12, s. 42.

Partz H.: SEC has no authority over crypto, CFTC commissioner argues, https://cointelegraph.com/news/sec-has-no-authority-over-crypto-cftc-commissioner- argues.

Peirce H.H.: Statement on Settlement with BlockFi Lending LLC, https://www.sec.gov/news/statement/peirce-blockfi-20220214.

Piotrowska A.I.: Bitcoin. Płatnicze i inwestycyjne zastosowania kryptowaluty, Warszawa 2018, s. 42.

Ripple, czyli XPR się odradza i ma szanse na dalsze wzrosty, https://bithub.pl/wia- domosci/ripple-czyli-xpr-sie-odradza-i-ma-szanse-na-dalsze-wzrosty/.

Romanowski M.: Zasada numerus clausus a pojęcie security w prawie amerykańskim - wzmianka (w:) System prawa prywatnego, t. 18, Prawo papierów wartościowych, pod red. A. Szumańskiego, Warszawa 2016.

SEC Charges Ripple and Two Executives with Conducting 1.3 Billion Unregistered Securities Offering, https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2020-338.

SEC: Framework for "Investment Contract" Analysis of Digital Assets, https://www.sec.gov/corpfin/framework-investment-contract-analysis-digital-assets.

SEC: Report of Investigation Pursuant to Section 21(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: The DAO, https://www.sec.gov/litigation/investreport/34-81207.pdf.

Sultanik E.: Are Blockchains Decentralized? Unintended Centralities in Distributed Ledgers, https://assets-global.website-files.com/5fd11235b3950c2c1a3b6df4/62af6c641a672b3329b9a480_Unintended_Centralities_in_Distributed_Ledgers. pdf.

Sun X., Stasinakis Ch.: Decentralization illusion in DeFi: Evidence from MakerDAO, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3971791.

Szewczyk J.: O cywilnoprawnych aspektach bitcoina (cz. I), Monitor Prawniczy 2018, nr 5, s. 247.

Szostek D.: Blockchain a prawo, Warszawa 2018.

Szumański A.: Inne dokumenty związane z akcją (bezpośrednio bądź pośrednio) (w:) System prawa prywatnego, t. 19, Prawo papierów wartościowych, pod red. A. Szumańskiego, Warszawa 2006.

Tomczak T.: Ewolucja definicji kryptoaktywów w projekcie rozporządzenia MiCA, Przegląd Prawa Handlowego 2023, nr 3.

Web3 Fundation Team: Less Trust, More Truth: Polkadot's Native Token (DOT) Has Morphed and Is Not a Security. It Is Software, https://medium.com/web3foun- dation/less-trust-more-truth-polkadots-native-token-dot-has-morphed-and-is-not- a-security-b2a8847a70cc.

Williams D.: Three Charged In First Ever Cryptocurrency Insider Trading Tipping Scheme, https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/three-charged-first-ever-crypto-currency-insider-trading-tipping-scheme.

Wiśniewska A.: Obszary wykorzystywania walut wirtualnych w działalności przedsiębiorstwa, Acta Universitatis Nicolai Copernici. Zarządzanie 2018, t. 45, nr 3, s. 9.

Wnęk M.: Natura prawna kryptowaluty, Warszawa 2023.

Zacharzewski K.: Bitcoin jako przedmiot stosunków prawa prywatnego, Monitor Prawa Prywatnego 2014, nr 21, s. 1133.