Abstrakt
The article discusses possible grounds for the state responsibility for the consequences of climate change under Polish private law. There have been few pending cases in this respect, but the problem has as of the date hereof not been resolved by Polish courts. At the sane time the same question has already been debated by many non-Polish courts, and the wave of private claims for consequences of climate change seems to be building up. Although superficially, these cases seem analogous to cases involving protection of the right to an environment free of pollution, climate claims raise many additional questions that Polish courts have not yet been confronted with. Courts are faced particularly with the problems of causation, proof of damage, illegality of the state inaction or action non-adequate to international declarations and the problem called the drop in the Ocean, among others. The climate litigation could be successful under Polish regime only if flexible, nonconservative approach to several private law institutions is adopted. Few foreign courts implemented such flexible approach providing to the members of society legal instruments to challenge national climate policies. It is proposed that such approach is legitimate under Polish legal regime, but the final answer depends on balancing the values at stake.
Bibliografia
Adamczak-Retecka M., Odpowiedzialność odszkodowawcza za szkody klimatyczne z perspektywy prawa Unii Europejskiej, Gdańsk 2017.
Adelmant V., Alston P., Blainey M.: Human Rights and Climate Change Litigation: One Step Forward, Two Steps Backwards in the Irish Supreme Court, Journal of Human Rights Practice 2021, nr 13, s. 1-23.
de Arriba-Sellier N.: The Grande Synthe Saga Continues: A Pyrrhic victory for climate litigation?.
Backes Ch., Veen G.A.: Urgenda: the Final Judgment of the Dutch Supreme Court, Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law 2020, nr 17, s. 307-321.
Baran M., Iwanska B.: Access of an Environmental Organisation to Court in Light of the EU Standard Set by the Principle of Effective Legal (Judicial) Protection, European Energy and Environmental Law Review 2019, nr 28, s. 47-66.
Bouwer K.: The Future of Climate Change Litigation, Journal of Environmental Law 2018, nr 30, s. 483-506.
Cook J., Supran G., Lewandowsky S., Oreskes N., Maibach E.: America Misled: How the fossil fuel industry deliberately misled Americans about climate change, Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication 2019.
Grzeszczak T., Dobro osobiste jako dobro zindywidualizowane, Przegląd Sądowy 2018, nr 4, s. 7-41.
Hilson Ch.: It s All About Climate Change, Stupid! Exploring the Relationship Between Environmental Law and Climate Law, Journal of Environmental Law 2013, nr 25, s. 359-370.
Hosli A.: Milieudefensie et al. v. Shell: A Tipping Point in Climate Change Litigation against Corporations?, Climate Law 2021, nr 11, s. 195-209.
Iwańska B.: Zróżnicowanie i ograniczenie w dostępie do wymiaru sprawiedliwości w sprawach ochrony środowiska. Uwagi na tle implementacji konwencji z Aarchus w prawie unijnym, Europejski Przegląd Sądowy 2020, nr 10, s. 5-21.
Keane P.: How the oil industry made us doubt climate change, BBC News September 20, 2020.
Kelleher O., The Supreme Court of Ireland s decision in Friends of the Irish Environment v. Government of Ireland (Climate Case Ireland).
Leijten I.: Human rights v. Insufficient climate action: The Urgenda case, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 2019, nr 37, s. 115-116.
Pazdan M.: Dobra osobiste i ich ochrona (w:) System prawa prywatnego, t. I, Prawo cywilne - część ogólna, pod red. M. Safjana, Warszawa 2007.
Peel J., Issues in climate change litigation, Carbon and Climate Law Review 2011, nr 5, s. 15-24.
Przybojewska I., Trzeci filar konwencji z Aarchus oraz rola Komitetu ds. Przestrzegania Konwencji z Aarchus, Europejski Przegląd Sądowy 2020, nr 10, s. 22-29.
Renglet Ch., Smis S.: The Belgian Climate Case: A Step Forward in Invoking Human Rights Standards in Climate Litigation?, ASIL Insights 2021, nr 25, s. 1-6.
Rola sądów i trybunałów w ochronie środowiska, pod red. J. Rotki, Warszawa 2016.
Safjan M.: Prawo prywatne a prawo publiczne (w:) System prawa prywatnego, t. I, Prawo cywilne - część ogólna, pod red. M. Safjana, Warszawa 2007.
Savaresi A.: Human rights and the impacts of climate change: Revisiting the assumptions, Onati Socio-Legal Series 2021, nr 11, s. 231-253.
Setzer J., Vanhala L.: Climate Change Litigation: A Review of Research on Courts and Litigants in Climate Governance, WIREs Climate Change 2019, nr 580, s. 1-19.
Torre-Schaub M.: Chapter 6 Climate Change Litigation in France: New Perspectives and Trends (w:) Climate Change Litigation: Global Perspectives, eds. I. Alogna, Ch. Baker, J.-P. Gauci, Nijhoff 2021.
Wewerinke-Singh M.: State Responsibility for Human Rights Violations Associated With Climate Change (w:) Routledge Handbook of Human Rights and Climate Governance, eds. S. Duyck, S. Jodoin, A. Johl, New York 2018, s. 75-89.
Wewerinke-Singh M., McCoach A.: The State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation: Distilling best practice and lessons learnt for the future rights-based climate litigation, Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law 2021, nr 30, s. 275-283.
Zimniewicz K.: O globalnym ociepleniu w kontekście misji nauki i prawdy naukowej, Zeszyty Naukowe ZPSB Firma i Rynek 2020, nr 1, s. 65-69.