Abstract
This work presents the most important legal issues related to dispute resolution at the sports level. The author, recalling the manner of proceedings before the most important world sports court, wants to show the significant advantages of the arbitration procedure, which is a reformatory way of solving all antagonisms that bind subjects involved in the areas of physical activity. The aim of the work was to show legal problems on the part of a person interested in the world of sport, willing to engage in the possibility of introducing legalistic changes that allow fair and consistent with the spirit of "fair play" of people who shape the modern view and image of the sports environment. The work uses monographic and comparative methods, which allowed for meticulous presentation of current formal and legal problems that surround sport from everywhere and become a barrier that could bring this field to the field of afer and dirty business sites. The analysis made as part of the following work allows to conclude that the existence of an independent conciliation court dealing with sports matters is necessary to be able to maintain the area of ??sports competition away from the sphere of influence of people whose one purpose is to use sport as an important field for expanding their own negative interests. whole entourage. The most important conclusion resulting from the work is the conviction that sport is exposed to continuous negative agitations from entities wishing to identify sport and business. Through the functioning of specialist legal forms and institutions that will ensure compliance with them, it is possible to create from the professional physical activity matter that brings legal and just values ??that can shape the young generations for whom clean and healthy competition will become a priority.
References
Wyrok Trybunału w sprawie Radio Corporation America vs. The National Government of the Republic of China, z dnia 13.04.1935 roku.
N. Ando, Permanent Court of Arbitration , ust. 38.
Ch. H. Brower II, Arbitration, ust.33-36.
II. Literatura
Na podstawie pracy dyplomowej: Tartak J., Postępowanie arbirażowe jako alternatywny sposób rozwiązywania sporów sportowych na przykłądzie metod funkcjonowania sądu koncyliacyjnego w Lozannie, Gdynia 2018.
Lee R., Eric Lee? Dictionary of Arbitration Law & Practice 2nd ed, Oxford 2011.
Curzon L. B., Richards P., The Longman Dictionary of Law, Essex 2007.
Marciniak K. J., Arbitraż z perspektywy rozwoju historycznego prawa międzynarodowego, Warszawa 2014.
Kałużny T., Zapis na sąd polubowny jako podstawa współczesnego rozstrzygania sporów sądowych, Białystok 2016.
Gruszewska E., Międzynarodowe Centrum Rozstrzygania Sporów Inwestycyjnych, analiza prawnomiędzynarodowa z perspektywy Polski, Białystok 2014.
Nafziger James A.R., International Sports Law: A Replay of Characteristic and Trends, Waszyngton 1992.
Anderson D., Modern Sports Law, Oxford 2010.
Sands P, Reflections on International Judicialization, The European Journal of International Law Vol. 27 no. 4, Oxford 2017,
Ioannidis G., Yearbook of International Sports Arbitration 2015, Heidelberg 2016.
Stodółka W., Szymura M., Sportowy Sąd Arbitrażowy jako przykład wykorzystania alternatywnych metod rozstrzygania sporów w prawi sportowym na szczeblu międzynarodowym, Wrocław 2016.
Arachi V., Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) and its case law significance in the advancement of Lex Sportiva, Thessaloniki 2013.
Nafziger J.A.R., Ross S.F., Handbook on International Sports Law, Northampton 2011.
Anderson J., Leading Cases in Sport Law, Hague 2013.
Mclaren R.H., The Court of Arbitration in Sport: An Independent Arena for the World?s Sports Disputes, Valparaiso 2001.
Wild A., CAS and Football: Landmark Cases, Hague 2011.
Viret M., Evidence in Anti-Doping at the Intersection of Science & Law, Hague 2016.
Czarnota P. A., FIFA Transfer Rules and Unilateral Termination Without ?Just Casue?, ?Berkeley Journal of Entertainment and Sports Law?, nr 2.
Pashorina-Nichols V., The Court of Arbitration for Sport really arbitration ?, Wellington 2015.
Dabscheck B., Developing Uniform Criteria for The Specificity of Sport: The Webster Case, ?Australian and New Zealand Sports Law Journal? 2008, nr 3.
III. Internet
www.epolityka.pl
www.pca-cpa.org
www.nortonrosefullbright.com
www.out-law.com
www.raportsekocenbud.pl
www.olimpijski.pl
www.rp.pl
www.prawo.gazetaprawna.pl
www.kancelariasportu.pl
www.naszosie.pl
www.sportslawbulletin.org
www.globalarbitrationreview.com
www.mondaq.com
www.asser.nl
www.nobi.nlm.nih.gov
www.serwisy.gazetaprawna.pl
www.provincialcourt.bc.ca
www.kluwerarbitrationblog.com
www.mcfaddenslaw.co.uk
www.igol.pl
www.journalonline.co.uk