Abstract
The author presents trends in modern legal discussion on prescription. He suggests that the trends are defined by three basic issues. The first question is on
relevance of prescription in the 21st century. The second issue concerns the future
of the legal institution and the scope of its application in the new reality, i.e.
determined by technological changes. The third makes us discuss whether we
deal with a single legal construct or with many institutions covered for historical
reasons by the same name. The article discusses the judgment of the European
Court of Human Rights in case JA Pye (Oxford) Ltd v. The United Kingdom, opinions of lawyers in common law countries, specialists in continental law, mixed
jurisdiction, and legal systems of Asian states. The author suggests significant
importance of technological changes, including technologies based on blockchain
and the Internet of Things. He discusses in detail the shape of legal regulations
regarding prescription in Louisiana (USA) and the province of Quebec (Canada).
Finally, he refers to the Roman legal tradition as the best tertium comparationis
for discussions on prescription in any major legal orders of the world.
References
Arrett M.J., Adverse Possession of Copyright: A Proposal to Complete Copyright?s Unification with Property Law, ?The Journal of Corporation Law? 2005
Bagley C.E., Clarkson G. , Adverse Possession for Intellectual Property: Adapting and Ancient Concept to Resolve Conflicts Between Antitrust and Intellectual Property Laws in the Information Age, ?Harvard Journal of Law & Technology?, t. 16, nr 2, 2003
Bahga A., Madisetti V., Internet of Things. A Hand-On Approach, 2015
Blajer P., Nabycie przedsiębiorstwa będącego przedmiotem zapisu windykacyjnego. Aspekty materialno- proceduralno- prawne, Warszawa 2016
Broder A.N., Comparing Apples to APPLs: Importing the Doctrine of Adverse Possession in Real Property to Patent Law, ?NYU Journal of Law & Liberty? t. 2:557 (2007).
Caterina R., Some Comparative Remarks on JA Pye (Oxford) Ltd v. The United Kingdom, ?European Review of Private Law, 2007 (15), nr 2
Daus M.W., The Adverse Possession of Copyright, ?Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Journal? t. 13 (1992)
Delisle L., L'auteur du Grand coutumier de France, [w:] Biblioth?que de l'école des chartes, 1880, t. 41
Diedrich H., Ethereum, 2015
Drescher D., Blockchain Basics. A non-technical introduction in 25 steps, Frankfurt am Main 2017
Franklin M., Franklin D., Introdution to Quebec Law, ed. 3, Toronto
Gragilia J.M., Mellon Ch., Blockchain and Propoerty in 2018, ?Innovations? t. 12, nr 1/2, 2018
Gretton G.L, Steven A.J.M., Property, Trusts and Succession, ed. 3, Haywards Heath-London 2017
Henclewski A., Zażalenie do Pana Boga ? czyli utrata prawa własność i nieruchomości przez zasiedzenie, cz. I, ?Nieruchomości? 2004, nr 11
Henclewski A., Zażalenie do Pana Boga ? czyli utrata prawa własność i nieruchomości przez zasiedzenie, cz. II, ?Nieruchomości? 2004, nr 12
Kilgore L., The Ten-Year Acquisitive Prescription of Immovables, ?Louisiana Law Review? t. 36 (1975)
Las Siete Partidas. Volume 3: Medieval. Lawyers and Their Work, trans. S.P. Scott, Philadelphia 2001
Law Reform Commission of Hong Kong, Report. Adverse Possession, 2014
Le Grand Coutumier de France, ed. É. Laboulaye, R. Dareste, 1969
Lihong Z., The Latest Developments in the Codification of Chinese Civil Law, ?Tulane Law Review?. 83:999 (2009)
Linford J., Trademark Owner as Adverse Possessor: Productive Use and Property Acquisition, ?Case Western Reserve Law Review?, t. 63, nr 3, 2013
Longchamps de Bérier F., Z uwag do metodologii nauki prawa prywatnego: argumenty historyczny, dogmatyczny i prawnoporwnawczy na przykładzie darowizny na wypadek śmierci oraz zapisu windykacyjnego, [w:] Prawo obce w doktrynie prawa polskiego, red. A. Wudarski, Warszawa 2016
Louisiana Legal Archives, A Republication of the Project of the Civil Code of Louisiana of 1825, New Orleans 1937
Lovett J., Disseisin, Doubt, and Debate: Adverse Possession Scholarship in the United States (1881-1986), ?Texas A&M Law Review?, t. 5, nr 1, 2018, passim
Lovett J.A., Precarious Possession, ?Louisiana Law Review?, t. 77 (2017)
Lovett L., Tacking in a Mixed Jurisdiction, [w:] Nothing so Practical as a Good Theory: Festschrift for George L. Gretton 162, 2017
Meeks K.M., Adverse Possession of Orphan Works, ?Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review? 33:1 (2012).
Montmollin Marler W. de, The Law of Real Property. Quebec, Toronto 1932
Morek R., Komentarz do art. 172 Kodeksu cywilnego, [w:] Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz, red. K. Osajda, Wyd. 20, Legalis 2018
OpenLaw Team, The Purchase and Sale of Real Property on Ethereum, 24 kwietnia 2018 r., https://media.consensys.net/the-purchase-and-sale-of-real-property-on-ethereum-55bdc289a7b5 [ost. wejście: 5.11.2018 r., godz. 13:39].
Planiol M., Treatise on the Civil Law, Volume 1, Part 2 Nos. 1610 to 3097, transl. Louisiana State Law Institute, ed. 12, t. 1, 1939
Polain M.-L., Les éditions du Grand Coutumier de France, 1514-1539-1598-1868, [w:] Revue des livres anciens: documents d'histoire littéraire, red. L. Loviot, Paris 1914
Principles of European Law. Study Group on a European Civil Code: Acquisition and Loss of Ownership of Goods (PEL Acq. Own.), red. B. Lurger, W. Faber, Oxford 2011
Rej P., Raman A.C., The Internet of Things. Enabling Technologies, Platforms, and Use Cases, Boca Raton 2017
Rodriguez de las Heras Ballel T., Introduction to Spanish Private Law. Facing the social and economic challenges, London-New York
Sagaert V., Prescription in French and Belgian Property Law after the Pye Judgment, ?European Review of Private Law, 2007 (15), nr 2
Salomons A.F., How to Draft Rules on the Bona Fide Acquisition of Movables for Europe? Some Remarks on Method and Content, [w:] Rules of the Transfer of Movables. A Candidate for European Harmonization or National Reforms?, red. W. Faber, B. Lurger, Munich 2008
Schrage E.J.H., res habilis, titulus, fides, possessio, tempus. A medieval mnemonic hexameter?, [w:] F. Sturm, P. Thomas, J. Otto, Liber Amicorum Guido Tsuno, Frankfurt nad Menem.
Shengping G., Five Attempts to Draft the Civil Code of New China and Its Latest Development, 4 ?China Legal Science? 4: 143 (2016)
Sison B., Good Faith as an Element of Prescription to Immovables, ?Phillipine Law Journal? t. 25 (1950)
Swan M., Blockchain. Blueprint for a New Economy, Bejling-Cambridge-Farnham-Köln-Sebastopol-Tokyo 2015
Szolc-Nartowski B., Error in nomine. Rzymska myśl prawnicza i współczesne wyzwania, Bielsko-Biała 2013
Tzafestes S.G., Ethics and Law in the Internet of Things World, ?Smart Cities? 2018, nr 1
Walt van A.J., Property in the margins, Oxford-Portland 2009
Walt van A.J., Maris E.J., The Constitutionality of Acquisitive Prescription: A Section 25 Analysis, ?Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg? 2012/4,
Yin Teo H., A Critique of the Doctrine of Adverse Possession, ?Australian National University, Cross sections? t. 4, 2008, s. 133.
Zoll F. (1865-1948), Privatrechtliche Studien aus dem Patentrechte mit vornehmlicher Berücksichtigung des österreichischen Rechtes, ?Zeintschrift für das privat- und öffentliche Recht der Gegenwart? 21 (1894),
Zoll F. (1865-1948), Posiadanie według prawa cywilnego austriackiego, Lwów 1902, ss. 96; Th. Rüfner, Possession of Incorporeals, [w:] The Concequences of Possession, ed. E. Descheemaeker, Edinburgh 2014, s. 181.
Żok K., Odpowiedzialność zapisobiercy windykacyjnego za długi spadkowe ? zagadnienia konstrukcyjne, ?Forum Prawnicze? 2016/5
Bagley C.E., Clarkson G. , Adverse Possession for Intellectual Property: Adapting and Ancient Concept to Resolve Conflicts Between Antitrust and Intellectual Property Laws in the Information Age, ?Harvard Journal of Law & Technology?, t. 16, nr 2, 2003
Bahga A., Madisetti V., Internet of Things. A Hand-On Approach, 2015
Blajer P., Nabycie przedsiębiorstwa będącego przedmiotem zapisu windykacyjnego. Aspekty materialno- proceduralno- prawne, Warszawa 2016
Broder A.N., Comparing Apples to APPLs: Importing the Doctrine of Adverse Possession in Real Property to Patent Law, ?NYU Journal of Law & Liberty? t. 2:557 (2007).
Caterina R., Some Comparative Remarks on JA Pye (Oxford) Ltd v. The United Kingdom, ?European Review of Private Law, 2007 (15), nr 2
Daus M.W., The Adverse Possession of Copyright, ?Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Journal? t. 13 (1992)
Delisle L., L'auteur du Grand coutumier de France, [w:] Biblioth?que de l'école des chartes, 1880, t. 41
Diedrich H., Ethereum, 2015
Drescher D., Blockchain Basics. A non-technical introduction in 25 steps, Frankfurt am Main 2017
Franklin M., Franklin D., Introdution to Quebec Law, ed. 3, Toronto
Gragilia J.M., Mellon Ch., Blockchain and Propoerty in 2018, ?Innovations? t. 12, nr 1/2, 2018
Gretton G.L, Steven A.J.M., Property, Trusts and Succession, ed. 3, Haywards Heath-London 2017
Henclewski A., Zażalenie do Pana Boga ? czyli utrata prawa własność i nieruchomości przez zasiedzenie, cz. I, ?Nieruchomości? 2004, nr 11
Henclewski A., Zażalenie do Pana Boga ? czyli utrata prawa własność i nieruchomości przez zasiedzenie, cz. II, ?Nieruchomości? 2004, nr 12
Kilgore L., The Ten-Year Acquisitive Prescription of Immovables, ?Louisiana Law Review? t. 36 (1975)
Las Siete Partidas. Volume 3: Medieval. Lawyers and Their Work, trans. S.P. Scott, Philadelphia 2001
Law Reform Commission of Hong Kong, Report. Adverse Possession, 2014
Le Grand Coutumier de France, ed. É. Laboulaye, R. Dareste, 1969
Lihong Z., The Latest Developments in the Codification of Chinese Civil Law, ?Tulane Law Review?. 83:999 (2009)
Linford J., Trademark Owner as Adverse Possessor: Productive Use and Property Acquisition, ?Case Western Reserve Law Review?, t. 63, nr 3, 2013
Longchamps de Bérier F., Z uwag do metodologii nauki prawa prywatnego: argumenty historyczny, dogmatyczny i prawnoporwnawczy na przykładzie darowizny na wypadek śmierci oraz zapisu windykacyjnego, [w:] Prawo obce w doktrynie prawa polskiego, red. A. Wudarski, Warszawa 2016
Louisiana Legal Archives, A Republication of the Project of the Civil Code of Louisiana of 1825, New Orleans 1937
Lovett J., Disseisin, Doubt, and Debate: Adverse Possession Scholarship in the United States (1881-1986), ?Texas A&M Law Review?, t. 5, nr 1, 2018, passim
Lovett J.A., Precarious Possession, ?Louisiana Law Review?, t. 77 (2017)
Lovett L., Tacking in a Mixed Jurisdiction, [w:] Nothing so Practical as a Good Theory: Festschrift for George L. Gretton 162, 2017
Meeks K.M., Adverse Possession of Orphan Works, ?Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review? 33:1 (2012).
Montmollin Marler W. de, The Law of Real Property. Quebec, Toronto 1932
Morek R., Komentarz do art. 172 Kodeksu cywilnego, [w:] Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz, red. K. Osajda, Wyd. 20, Legalis 2018
OpenLaw Team, The Purchase and Sale of Real Property on Ethereum, 24 kwietnia 2018 r., https://media.consensys.net/the-purchase-and-sale-of-real-property-on-ethereum-55bdc289a7b5 [ost. wejście: 5.11.2018 r., godz. 13:39].
Planiol M., Treatise on the Civil Law, Volume 1, Part 2 Nos. 1610 to 3097, transl. Louisiana State Law Institute, ed. 12, t. 1, 1939
Polain M.-L., Les éditions du Grand Coutumier de France, 1514-1539-1598-1868, [w:] Revue des livres anciens: documents d'histoire littéraire, red. L. Loviot, Paris 1914
Principles of European Law. Study Group on a European Civil Code: Acquisition and Loss of Ownership of Goods (PEL Acq. Own.), red. B. Lurger, W. Faber, Oxford 2011
Rej P., Raman A.C., The Internet of Things. Enabling Technologies, Platforms, and Use Cases, Boca Raton 2017
Rodriguez de las Heras Ballel T., Introduction to Spanish Private Law. Facing the social and economic challenges, London-New York
Sagaert V., Prescription in French and Belgian Property Law after the Pye Judgment, ?European Review of Private Law, 2007 (15), nr 2
Salomons A.F., How to Draft Rules on the Bona Fide Acquisition of Movables for Europe? Some Remarks on Method and Content, [w:] Rules of the Transfer of Movables. A Candidate for European Harmonization or National Reforms?, red. W. Faber, B. Lurger, Munich 2008
Schrage E.J.H., res habilis, titulus, fides, possessio, tempus. A medieval mnemonic hexameter?, [w:] F. Sturm, P. Thomas, J. Otto, Liber Amicorum Guido Tsuno, Frankfurt nad Menem.
Shengping G., Five Attempts to Draft the Civil Code of New China and Its Latest Development, 4 ?China Legal Science? 4: 143 (2016)
Sison B., Good Faith as an Element of Prescription to Immovables, ?Phillipine Law Journal? t. 25 (1950)
Swan M., Blockchain. Blueprint for a New Economy, Bejling-Cambridge-Farnham-Köln-Sebastopol-Tokyo 2015
Szolc-Nartowski B., Error in nomine. Rzymska myśl prawnicza i współczesne wyzwania, Bielsko-Biała 2013
Tzafestes S.G., Ethics and Law in the Internet of Things World, ?Smart Cities? 2018, nr 1
Walt van A.J., Property in the margins, Oxford-Portland 2009
Walt van A.J., Maris E.J., The Constitutionality of Acquisitive Prescription: A Section 25 Analysis, ?Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg? 2012/4,
Yin Teo H., A Critique of the Doctrine of Adverse Possession, ?Australian National University, Cross sections? t. 4, 2008, s. 133.
Zoll F. (1865-1948), Privatrechtliche Studien aus dem Patentrechte mit vornehmlicher Berücksichtigung des österreichischen Rechtes, ?Zeintschrift für das privat- und öffentliche Recht der Gegenwart? 21 (1894),
Zoll F. (1865-1948), Posiadanie według prawa cywilnego austriackiego, Lwów 1902, ss. 96; Th. Rüfner, Possession of Incorporeals, [w:] The Concequences of Possession, ed. E. Descheemaeker, Edinburgh 2014, s. 181.
Żok K., Odpowiedzialność zapisobiercy windykacyjnego za długi spadkowe ? zagadnienia konstrukcyjne, ?Forum Prawnicze? 2016/5
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.