Abstrakt
The venire contra factum proprium nemini licet legal maxim in legal argumentation expresses an objection against inconsistent behaviour. However, opinions regarding its significance are not uniform in legal discussion It inspires the following questions: Why was that maxim introduced into legal argumentation? Are there any systemic elements in in the pre-codification history of the maxim? Can they inspire a contemporary view on a useful method of referring to the maxim in private law and if so ? how? The paper deals with these issues. The historical and comparative analysis leads to two main conclusions: firstly, immanent flexibility of the maxim should inspire moderation in declaring the venire contra factum proprium prohibition as one of the basic principles of private law. Secondly, the effect of being bound by an act by a person who wrongly caused its invalidity, which has been based on the maxim in pre-codification legal practice, is worth thinking through in the world of developed theories of legal transactions.
Bibliografia
Acosta N., Tractatus de privilegiis credito, 1645
Astone F., Venire contra factum proprium, Napoli 2006
Baldus de Ubaldis, Super VII, VIII et IX Codicis commentaria, Lugduni 1539
Baldus de Ubaldis, Repertorium in omnia consiliorum, Venetiis 1580
Baptista Nicolaus I., Regularum iuris civils quam pontificii ex celeberrimis et excelentissimis doctoribus, vol. 2, Francofurti ad Moenum 1586
Bar v. Chr, Dopffel P. (eds.), Deutsches Internationales Privatrecht im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert, vol. 1, Tübingen 1995
Bartollus de Saxoferrato, Commenmtaria, vol. 1, Digstum vetus, Venetis 1516 (reprint Roma 1998)
Bellapertica P., Quaestiones et decisiones aureae, Basileae 1607
Brinz A., Lehrbuch der Pandekten, 2nd edition, vol. 3, Erlangen 1888
Brocardica Azoni sive generalia iuris Azonis Bononiensis, Basileae 1567
Brunnemann I., Commentarius in Codicem Iustinianeum, Lispae 1708
Corpus Iuris Civilis. Digestum vetus, vol. 1, Lugduni 1627
Cuena F., Alejandro Tarta?a (1423/1424-1477) (in:) R. Domingo (ed.) Juristos universales, vol. 1, Madrid 2004, p. 556-557
Dajczak W., The Nature of the Contract in Reasoning of Civilian Jurists, Poznań 2012
Dette H. W., Venire contra factu proprium nulli conceditur. Zur Konkretisierung eines Rechtssprichtwortes, Berlin 1985
Everardus N., Topicorum seu de locis legalibus, Lovanium, 1516
Everardus N., Argumentorum legales, Lugduni 1568
Faber A., Codex Fabrianus definitionum forensium et rerum in sacro Sabaudiae Senatu, Lugduni 1610
Festi F., Il divieto di ?venire contro il fatto proprio?, Milano 2007
Frońska J., The Memory of Roman Law in an Illuminated Manuscript of Justinian?s Digest (in:) E. Brenner, M. Cohen, M. Franklin-Brown (eds.) Memory and Commmoration in Medieval Culture, Farnham 2013
Grotius H., De jure belli ac pacis, Amstelaedeami 1720
Guyon G., Pierre de Belleperche (1250-1308) (in:) R. Domingo (ed.), Juristos universales, vol. 1, Madrid 2004, p. 480-483
Isola L., Venire contra factum proprium. Herkunft und Grundlagen eines sprichwörtlichen Rechtsprinzips, Frankfurt am Main 2017
Jansen N, Zimmermann R. (eds.), Commentaries on European Contract Law, Oxford 2018
Lange H., Römisches Recht im Mittelalter, vol. 1, Glossatoren, München 1997
Lange H., Azón (+ ca. 1220) (in:) R. Domingo (ed.) Juristos universales, vol. 1, Madrid 2004, p. 380-384
Lange H., Kriechbaum M., Römisches Recht im Mittelalter, vol. 2, Kommentatoren, München 2007
Longchamps de Bérier F., L?abuso del diritto nell?esperienza del diritto privato romano, Torino 2013
Maranta R., Conislia sive responsa, Coloniae Agrippinae 1599
Mazur P, Powoływanie się na nieważność czynności prawnej z naruszeniem zasady venire contra factum proprium niemini licet, ?Przegląd Sądowy? 2017, issue 10, p. 56-66
Puffendorf S., De jure naturae et gentium, Francofurti ad Moenum 1684
Riezler E., Venire contra factum proprium. Studien im römischen, englischen und deutschen Civilrecht, Leipzig 1912
Schacher J. Ch., Disputatio iuridica. De impugnatione facti proprii, 1688
Singer R., Das Verbot wiedersprüchlichen Verhaltens, München 1993
Stelmach J., Kodeks argumentacyjny dla prawników, Kraków 2003
Stelmachowski A., Zarys teorii prawa cywilnego, Warszawa 1998
Surdus I. P., Consiliorum sive responsorum, 2nd book, Francofurti ad Moenum 1630
Tartagnus A., Consiliorum seu responsorum, 2nd book, Venetiis 1610
Vaccaro F., Juris aphorismi ordine alphabetico digesti, Napoli 1842
Wieacker F., Privatrechtsgeschichte der Neuzeit, Göttingen 1967
Wijffels A., Everardus. A Book on Topics (in:) S. Dauchy, G. Martyn, A. Musson, H. Pihlajmäki, A. Wijffels (eds.) The Formation and Transmission of Western Legal Culture. 150 Books that Made the Law in the Age of Printing, 2016, p. 65-67.