Audiovisual Orphan Works: a Legal Perspective of the Portugal
PDF

Słowa kluczowe

utwory osierocone
autorzy
ochrona
utwory audiowizualne
dziedzictwo nieobecnych

Abstrakt

When we speak of orphan works, we must bear in mind that the concepts of 'author' and 'work' are essential. Despite how well it is argued (e.g. by Caridad Del Carmen Valdez Diaz, 2014) that there is neither a work without an author nor an author without a work, the work can have an autonomous life without the author, and it is in this context that the problem of orphan works can be examined. This issue has gained a greater significance with the current possibilities of digitization and placement of works on the Internet, by which they become available globally. In fact, digitizing a work implies its copying, which in itself immediately poses intellectual property problems. Orphan works and their status are described in the Portuguese Copyright and Related Rights Code (CDADC), which was adopted due to the transposition of Directive 2012/28/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on certain permitted uses of orphan works. The directive provides for the use of orphan works only by public entities, as stipulated under Article 1, and the use of those works is allowed only for cultural and educational purposes in accordance with Article 6(2). National legislators have discretion to frame other situations when orphan works may be used, provided that those do not contravene the provisions of the directive. The EU has been carrying out a copyright reform to adapt to the digital age and address such issues as orphan works. As part of the Digital Single Market Strategy, the EU adopted Directive (EU) 2019/790 of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market. This directive aims to harmonize copyright regulations in the digital market, ensuring fair remuneration for authors and creators. It introduces new provisions for the use of orphan works yet not specifically for audiovisual orphan works.

PDF

Bibliografia

Barberan Molina P.: Temas de actualidad en derechos de autor, Madrid: ACTA 2011.

Brito J., Dooling B.: An Orphan Works Affirmative Defense to Copyright Infringement Actions, Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review 2005, Vol. 12, Issue 1, pp. 75-113.

Espin Alba I.: Obras huerfanas y derecho de autor, Navarra: Aranzadi 2014.

Espin Alba I.: Um desafio para os direitos de autor no Mercado Unico Digital: a edicao de obras que deixaram de ser comercializadas, UNIO - EU Law Journal, Centro de Estudos em Direito da Uniao Europeia Escola de Direito - Universidade do Minho, July 2018, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 90-102.

EU Commission: Communication from the Commission of 19 October 2009 - Copyright in the Knowledge Economy, COM(2009) 532 final.

EU Commission: Green Paper - Copyright in the Knowledge Economy of 16 July 2008, COM(2008) 0466 final.

Gompel, S. van: The Orphan Works Chimera and How to Defeat it: A View from Across the Atlantic, Berkley Technology Law Journal 2012, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 1347-1378.

Goncalves N.: A proposta de diretiva sobre as obras orfas, Direito da Sociedade de Informacao, Vol. 10, Coimbra: APDI/Coimbra Editora 2012.

Grau-Kuntz K.: Dominio publico e direito de autor: do requisito da originalidade como contribuicao reflexivo-transformadora, Revista Eletronica do IBPI, No. 6, pp. 5-67.

Inesi A.: A Theory of De Minimis and a Proposal for its Application in Copyright, Berkeley Technology Law Journal 2006, Vol. 21, No. 2.

Lacruz Mantecon M.L.: Las obras huerfanas encuentran madrastra, Anuario de Propriedade Intelectual 2013, Madrid: 2014.

Liu J.: An Empirical Study of Transformative Use in Copyright Law, Stanford Technology Law Review 2019, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 163-241.

Mendoza Diaz J.: Notas cubanas a las obras huerfanas (in:) Obras ineditas, anonimas, seudonimas, postumas y huerfanas, ed. E. Serrano Gomez, Coleccion de Propiedad Intelectual, Madrid: Reus, 2014.

Navarro Mendizabal I.: Autores ausentes y obras huerfanas (in:) Estados civiles y derechos de autor, eds. T. Carrancho Herrero, E. Vicente Domingo, Coleccion de Propiedad Intelectual, Madrid: Reus 2015.

Palmela Fidalgo V.: A Diretiva 2012/28/EU e a problematica das obras orfas, Actas de Derecho Industrial y Derecho de Autor 2014-2015, Vol. 35.

Rendas T.: Copyright, Technology and the CJEU: An Empirical Study, IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2018, Vol. 49, No. 2, 153-184.

Rocha M.V.: Portugal (in:) International Encyclopaedia of Laws: Intellectual Property (p. 104), ed. H. Vanhees, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2017.

Serrano Fernandez M.: Los Derechos de explotacion de las obras huerfanas en el torno Digital: las dificultades de transposicion de la Diretiva 2012/28/EU al ordenamiento espańol (in:) Anuario de Propriedade Intelectual 2013, Madrid 2014.

Serrano Fernandez M. et al.: Propiedad intelectual en el siglo XXI: Nuevos continentes y su incidencia en el derecho de autor, Coleccion de Propiedad Intelectual, Madrid: Reus 2014.

Tobio Rivas A.: Las obras huerfanas, Revista de Derecho Mercantil 2017, No. 303, pp. 35-66.

Valdes Diaz C.D.C.: Obras ineditas, anonimas, seudonimas, postumas y huerfanas, Coleccion de Propiedad Intelectual, Madrid: Reus 2014.

Wachowicz M.: Estudio sobre el contenido audiovisual en el dominio publico y considerado como obra huerfana, OMPI 2021.

Mota Machado A.C.: Direitos autorais e as obras orfas, www.conteudojuridico. com.br/artigo,direitos-autorais-e-as-obras-orfas,51101.html (accessed: February 3, 2017).

Sousa Alves M.A., Marconi Rodrigues M.: O projeto Google Books e o direito de autor: uma analise do caso Authors Guild et al. v. Google (in:) XIX Encontro Nacional do CONPEDI, Fortaleza 2010. Anais do XIX Encontro Nacional do CONPEDI, Florianopolis/SC: Fundacao Boiteux, 2010, pp. 7915-7927, http:// www.academia.edu/482222/O_projeto_Google_Books_e_o_direito_de_autor_ uma_a n%C3%A1lise_do_caso_Authors_Guild_et_al._v._Google 59 (accessed: 14.09.2023).

Springman C.: Reform(aliz)ing Copyright, Stanford Law Review 2004, Vol. 57, pp. 485-568, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=578502 (accessed: 14.09.2023).

Vuopala A.: Assessment of the Orphan Works Issue and Costs for Rights Clearance, European Commission, DG Information Society and Media, Unit E4 Access to Information, May 2010, http://cultivate-cier.nl/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/ vuopala_report.pdf (accessed: 14.09.2023).

Walker Echenique E.: Uso de obras huerfanas: Estudio de diversas regulaciones en el derecho comparado como referencia para modernizar la regulación chilena sobre propiedad intelectual, Revista Chilena de Derecho 2014, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 845-870, https://dialnet.unirioja.es/revista/10893/A/2014 (accessed: 14.09. 2023).